Ignoring choice architecture in your delinquency management strategies is likely costing you recovered revenue. How so? Many past-due customers want to pay, but friction in the process keeps them from following through.

Choice architecture is the science of designing decision-making environments to guide behavior. When applied to collections, it reduces friction and motivates the customer to pay off their balance.

When the path to repayment isn’t clear, customers hesitate  

Small obstacles in the decision process—like unclear instructions, too much information, or an overload of options—can cause past-due customers to delay action, even if they intend to pay. In fact, a 2024 neuroscience study found that increasing the number of options led to negative evaluations and greater avoidance of making a choice, even when all the options were beneficial. The issue isn’t simply how many payment methods are offered, but whether taking action feels like the simplest next step.

Meet Lisa. She’s a busy professional who just received a past-due notice for her utility bill. The letter lists multiple ways to pay—log into an online portal, call an automated phone line, or mail a check.

Each of these methods may be effective, but none is presented in a way that makes taking action feel simple and immediate. Without a message that reduces the mental effort of deciding what to do next, Lisa hesitates. She tells herself she’ll come back to it later but doesn’t.

The costly mistake collections teams keep making

Traditional collections strategies rely on urgency, repetition, or penalties—methods that often backfire by increasing avoidance. Past-due customers don’t respond well to pressure alone; they need a clear, easy path to payment that feels manageable and within their control.  

How to make repayment the easiest choice for customers

When clients transition from traditional outreach, to Symend’s streamlined, behavioral science informed messaging, the results are dramatic. For example, when an original outreach included seven payment options, customers were overwhelmed by choice, leading to inaction. In contrast, a Symend designed outreach with just two focused calls-to-action (CTAs) resulted in a 133% increase in likelihood to pay and a staggering 675% increase in positive sentiment.

The reason is clear: too many options create choice overload, and psychological barriers like inertia, the ostrich effect, and status quo bias come into play. By simplifying the path forward and guiding attention to the immediate payment option, Symend not only increases positive and neutral customer engagement, but also makes it easier for people to take action—leading to better results for everyone involved.

That’s where choice architecture comes in

Instead of relying on pressure tactics, choice architecture removes barriers that prevent action. By making the payment process easier and more intuitive, it minimizes decision friction and encourages follow-through. For example, if Lisa’s repayment options were presented using behavioral messaging and choice architecture, she would see clear, actionable steps:

  • “Click here to pay now.”
  • “Review my payment plan options.”
  • “Connect with an agent now for additional support.”

‍

When collections messaging removes unnecessary friction and presents a clear, manageable next step, it becomes easier for customers to follow through and resolve their past-due balances.

In our next blog, we’ll explore how you can use choice architecture to turn payment intent into action—breaking down the 6 key principles that make repayment easier and more intuitive.

‍